Garmin 1022 vs 106sv – Who is the Winner?

When it comes to finding the best marine chart plotters for your boat, the GPSMAP® 1022 and ECHOMAP™ Ultra 106sv from Garmin are two options that are worth considering. GPSMAP 1022 offers a larger screen, broader power input (10-32 Vdc), and extensive connectivity options. In contrast, ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv boasts built-in sonar features and a slightly lighter design. Consider specific needs for navigation, sonar, and power compatibility.

In this article, I’ll explain the similarities and differences between Garmin 1022 vs 106sv and show you a winner. So keep reading. 

Side-by-Side Comparison Between Garmin 1022 vs 106sv

Garmin 1022 vs 106sv: General Information Comparison

General InformationGPSMAP® 1022ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv
Dimension12.5″ x 7.3″ x 2.7″ (31.8 x 18.5 x 6.9 cm)11.6″ x 7.7″ x 3.9″ (29.5 x 19.5 x 9.8 cm)
InputKeyedTouchscreen with Keyed Assist
Display Size8.8″ x 4.9″; 10.1″ diagonal (22.4 x 12.5 cm; 25.7 cm diagonal)8.5″ x 5.4″; 10″ diagonal (21.7 x 13.6 cm; 25.4 cm diagonal)
Display Resolution1024 x 600 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
Display TypeWSVGA, NPWXGA, IPS
Weight4.1 lbs (1.85 kg)4.0 lbs (1.8 kg)
WaterproofIPX7IPX7
Mounting OptionsBail or flushBail or flush

Size and Dimensions

The Garmin GPSMAP 1022 measures 12.5 inches in width, 7.3 inches in height, and has a thickness of 2.7 inches. In comparison, the Garmin ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv is slightly more compact, with dimensions of 11.6 inches by 7.7 inches and a thickness of 3.9 inches. While the GPSMAP 1022 is larger, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv is slightly thicker.

Input and Interaction

Both devices utilize a combination of physical buttons (keyed) and a touchscreen interface. The GPSMAP 1022 features a touchscreen with Keyed Assist, enhancing user interaction. Similarly, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv incorporates a touchscreen with keyed functionality, providing users with multiple input options for navigation and control.

Display Features

The GPSMAP 1022 boasts a display size of 8.8 inches by 4.9 inches, resulting in a 10.1-inch diagonal screen. With a resolution of 1024 x 600 pixels, it delivers clear visuals for navigation. On the other hand, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv offers a slightly smaller display size of 8.5 inches by 5.4 inches, with a 10-inch diagonal. However, it surpasses the GPSMAP 1022 with a higher resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels, providing crisper images.

Weight and Portability

In terms of weight, the GPSMAP 1022 weighs 4.1 lbs (1.85 kg), while the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv is slightly lighter at 4.0 lbs (1.8 kg). Although there is a marginal difference, both devices remain relatively portable, ensuring ease of use and installation on boats or other marine settings.

Waterproof Design

Both the GPSMAP 1022 and the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv come with an IPX7 waterproof rating. This means they are designed to withstand exposure to water and can endure immersion up to a certain depth, making them suitable for marine environments where exposure to water is common.

Mounting Options

Both devices offer flexibility in terms of mounting. They can be installed using a bail (stand) or flush against a surface. This versatility allows users to choose the mounting option that best suits their preferences or the layout of their watercraft.

Garmin 106sv vs 1022: Maps & Memory Comparison

Maps & MemoryGPSMAP® 1022ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv
Accepts Data Cards2 microSD cards2 microSD cards
Waypoints50005000
Track Points50,00050,000
Tracks50 saved tracks50 saved tracks
Navigation Routes100100

Data Card Compatibility

Both the Garmin GPSMAP 1022 and the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv support expandable storage through the use of microSD cards. Users can insert up to 2 microSD cards in each device, allowing for additional map data, waypoints, and other information to be stored.

Waypoints and Track Points

Both devices offer ample space for saving waypoints and track points. With a capacity of 5000 waypoints and 50,000 track points, users can mark and navigate to numerous locations while keeping a detailed record of their travel history. This feature is especially useful for those who want to remember specific points of interest or retrace their paths.

Saved Tracks and Navigation Routes

The GPSMAP 1022 and the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv are equipped to store 50 saved tracks, providing users with the capability to record and revisit their navigational paths. Additionally, both devices can accommodate 100 navigation routes, enabling users to plan and follow predefined routes for efficient and stress-free navigation.

ECHOMAP™ 106sv vs GPSMAP® 1022 : Sonar Features Comparison

Sonar Features & SpecificationsGPSMAP® 1022ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv
Displays SonarYesYes
Traditional Sonar (Dual Frequency/Beam)Yes (with an external black box, sold separately)Built-in (single channel CHIRP, 70/83/200 kHz, L, M, H CHIRP)
ClearVüYes (with an external black box, sold separately)Built-in 260/455/800/1000/1200 kHz
SideVüYes (with external black box, sold separately)Built-in 260/455/800/1000/1200 kHz
Panoptix™ SonarN/AN/A
LiveScopeN/AN/A

Displays Sonar

Both the Garmin GPSMAP 1022 and ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv come equipped with sonar capabilities, allowing users to explore underwater terrain and locate fish or other objects. This feature enhances the devices’ functionality for marine activities, such as fishing or navigation.

Traditional Sonar

While the GPSMAP 1022 requires an external black box (sold separately) for traditional sonar with dual frequency/beam capabilities, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv boasts built-in traditional sonar. The ECHOMAP offers single-channel CHIRP sonar with frequencies of 70/83/200 kHz, providing users with clear and detailed underwater imagery without the need for additional external components.

ClearVü and SideVü

Both devices support ClearVü and SideVü sonar technologies. However, the GPSMAP 1022 relies on an external black box (sold separately) for these features, while the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv incorporates built-in ClearVü and SideVü capabilities. These technologies offer users a comprehensive view of what’s beneath and to the sides of their watercraft, aiding in navigation and fish finding.

Panoptix™ Sonar and LiveScope

Neither the GPSMAP 1022 nor the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv is equipped with Panoptix™ Sonar or LiveScope technologies. These advanced sonar features, which provide real-time and panoramic views of the underwater environment, are not available on these particular models.

GPSMAP® 1022 vs ECHOMAP™ Ultra 106sv : Connections Comparison

ConnectionsGPSMAP® 1022ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv
NMEA 2000® Ports11
NMEA0183 Input Ports11
NMEA 0183 Input (TX) Ports11
Video Input Ports1 (BNC composite)N/A
Garmin Marine Network Ports22 (large connector)
Garmin Wi-Fi Network (Local Connection)YesN/A
12-pin Transducer PortsN/A1 LVS sonar; 1 scanning sonar

NMEA Ports

Both the Garmin GPSMAP 1022 and ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv feature NMEA (National Marine Electronics Association) ports, facilitating communication between marine devices. Each device has one NMEA 2000 port and one NMEA 0183 input port, allowing for seamless integration with other compatible marine instruments and systems.

Video Input Ports

The GPSMAP 1022 includes a video input port with a BNC composite connection, enabling users to integrate video feeds into their navigation system. In contrast, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv does not have a dedicated video input port.

Garmin Marine Network Ports

The GPSMAP 1022 is equipped with two Garmin Marine Network ports featuring a large connector, enabling high-speed data transfer and connectivity with other Garmin marine devices. The ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv, however, does not have dedicated Garmin Marine Network ports.

Garmin Wi-Fi Network

The GPSMAP 1022 supports Garmin Wi-Fi Network for local wireless connections, providing users with the convenience of wireless data transfer and sharing within a localized network. The ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv, on the other hand, does not include this Wi-Fi network capability.

12-pin Transducer Ports

While the GPSMAP 1022 does not specify the presence of 12-pin transducer ports, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv is equipped with one LVS (LiveVü Forward and LiveVü Down) sonar transducer port and one scanning sonar transducer port. These ports allow for the connection of specific transducers to enhance sonar capabilities.

Garmin 1022 vs 106sv Electrical Features Comparison

Electrical FeaturesGPSMAP® 1022GPSMAP® 1042xsv
Power Input10 to 32 Vdc9 to 18 Vdc
Typical Current Draw at 12Vdc1.9 A2.8 A
Maximum Current Draw at 12Vdc2.7 A3.0 A
Maximum Power Usage at 10Vdc32.4 W24.4 W

Power Input

The Garmin GPSMAP 1022 and GPSMAP 1042xsv have different power input requirements. The GPSMAP 1022 accepts power within the range of 10 to 32 volts direct current (Vdc), while the GPSMAP 1042xsv has a slightly narrower range of 9 to 18 Vdc. This means that the GPSMAP 1022 is compatible with a broader range of power sources.

Current Draw at 12Vdc

When operating at 12 volts direct current, the GPSMAP 1022 has a typical current draw of 1.9 amperes, indicating the average amount of electrical current it consumes during regular use. In comparison, the GPSMAP 1042xsv has a slightly higher typical current draw at 2.8 amperes.

Maximum Current Draw at 12Vdc

For more demanding usage scenarios, the maximum current draw at 12 volts direct current is 2.7 amperes for the GPSMAP 1022 and 3.0 amperes for the GPSMAP 1042xsv. This represents the highest amount of electrical current these devices might draw under more intensive operations.

Maximum Power Usage at 10Vdc

In terms of maximum power usage at 10 volts direct current, the GPSMAP 1022 consumes up to 32.4 watts, while the GPSMAP 1042xsv uses a maximum of 24.4 watts. This measurement provides an indication of the maximum electrical power the devices can handle at the specified voltage.

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Pick

Based on the information provided, both the Garmin GPSMAP 1022 and the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv offer similar features and capabilities. However, there are a few key differences between the two models that may make one more suitable than the other depending on individual needs and preferences.

GPSMAP 106sv is Better – WHY?

Here are three reasons why the Garmin GPSMAP 106sv may be considered better:

  • Display: The ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv has a higher display resolution than the GPSMAP 1022, with a WXGA, IPS display at 1280 x 800 pixels, which provides a clearer and more detailed view of maps and sonar data.
  • Sonar: The ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv has built-in CHIRP and ClearVü/SideVü sonar capabilities, while the GPSMAP 1022 requires an external black box for traditional sonar and ClearVü/SideVü sonar. This means that the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv can offer more comprehensive and detailed underwater imaging.
  • Electrical Features: The ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv has a lower maximum power usage at 10Vdc, which means it is more energy-efficient and may save battery life in the long run.

GPSMAP 106sv

Overall, the ECHOMAP Ultra 106sv may be considered better than the GPSMAP 1022 for those who prioritize a high-resolution display, built-in sonar capabilities, and energy efficiency.

When Should You Opt for Garmin 1022?

Now, the GPSMAP 1022 may still be a good choice for those who prefer a keyed input and have specific needs for external sonar capabilities.

Garmin 1022

That’s everything on 1022 vs 106sv. Now it’s your turn to go for one.

0 thoughts on “Garmin 1022 vs 106sv – Who is the Winner?”

  1. Why did the geocacher bring a flashlight to the forest at night? Because they heard that caches have a tendency to “reflect” in the moonlight!

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top